Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 OCTOBER 2013

Guarantees And The 'One That Got Away'

Fieldfisher
Fieldfisher
Contributor
Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher is a European law firm with market-leading practices in many of the world’s most...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fieldfisher

It is often the case that a third party is called upon to guarantee a tenant's obligations under a lease, which provides a landlord with some degree of comfort that it has someone to turn to in the event of a tenant's demise.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
John Downs
John Downs

It is often the case that a third party is called upon to guarantee a tenant's obligations under a lease, which provides a landlord with some degree of comfort that it has someone to turn to in the event of a tenant's demise. The recent case of Topland Portfolio No 1 Ltd v Smiths News Trading Ltd illustrates how in some circumstances the reassurance of having a guarantor in place can be short-lived.

A lease was entered into in 1981 ("the Lease"). The tenant was WH Smith Do–It–All Ltd (then known as Payless DIY Ltd) ("the Tenant") and the guarantor was WH Smith & Son Ltd (known subsequently as Smiths News Trading Ltd) ("the Guarantor").  In 1987 a Licence for Alterations was entered into by the then landlord and the Tenant, but the Guarantor was not a party to the Licence (and did not consent to it).  Topland Portfolio No 1 Ltd ("Topland") subsequently acquired the freehold interest.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from