Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JANUARY 2017

Determining Liability After Property Fraud

In this case a legitimate and unfortunate purchaser was unable to recover its losses resulting from a fraudulent transaction where the fraudster had disappeared with the money.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

For Sale – No strings attached

P&P Property Limited v (1) Owen White & Catlin LLP and (2) Crownvent Limited t/a Winkworth [2016] EWHC 2276 (Ch) ("P&P")

Summary

In this case a legitimate and unfortunate purchaser was unable to recover its losses resulting from a fraudulent transaction where the fraudster had disappeared with the money.

The Court found that neither the seller's solicitors nor the estate agents were liable as they had not given an express warranty as to the identity of the seller. It also refused to impose a duty of care on estate agents in respect of purchasers.

The case gives a useful insight on warranties of authority and their application to solicitors and estate agents. It also considers the extent to which solicitors and estate agents are liable to ascertain the true identities of their clients. It should sound a warning note for anyone who is considering purchasing property to ensure that these checks are carried out and to consider

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from