Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 OCTOBER 2016

Dear Beatrice - Sep 28, 2016

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

In order to decide whether or not the alterations outlined above need to be removed to exercise the break, the first question to address is whether or not they are chattels.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Q. I am the tenant of commercial premises under a ten year lease, and I have served an option to break terminating the lease in six months' time. This option to break is subject to a condition to give vacant possession of the premises and to have complied with all repairing covenants in the lease. I have carried out works to the premises during the term under a licence for alterations, which include large amounts of partitioning, window blinds,  an alarm and kitchen units. I am anxious for the break to be effective. What kind of issues do I need to consider?

A. The break clause will only be effective if all of the conditions attaching to it have been satisfied.  The condition to provide vacant possession won't be complied with where there is any impediment that substantially prevents or interferes with the right of possession of a substantial part of the property. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from