Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 FEBRUARY 2026

Be Careful When Terminating Due To Late Interim Payments!

Shepherd and Wedderburn
Shepherd and Wedderburn
Contributor
Shepherd and Wedderburn

Shepherd and Wedderburn

We are an independent law firm, headquartered in Scotland, delivering high-quality legal advice and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shepherd and Wedderburn

The case of Providence Building Services Limited v Hexagon Housing Association Limited concerns the interpretation of a termination clause in a JCT Design and Build Contract.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The case of Providence Building Services Limited v Hexagon Housing Association Limited concerns the interpretation of a termination clause in a JCT Design and Build Contract. The decision from the Supreme Court reverses the decision made by the Court of Appeal around termination in the context of repeated late payments, and provides clarity on the interpretation of the specific clause as well as the court's approach to the interpretation of construction contracts generally.

The background to the appeal

Hexagon Housing Association Limited (the “Employer”) and Providence Building Services Limited (the “Contractor”) entered into a contract to build social housing.

A dispute arose which centred on the Employer's late payment of two interim payments. The Contractor served a ‘notice of specified default' in relation to the first late interim payment. The Employer subsequently paid the outstanding sum within the 28 day notice period under Clause 8.9.3, meaning the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from