Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 APRIL 2014

A Ray Of Light For Developers: Injunctions vs Damages

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

The Law Commission’s proposals for reforming rights of light are showing no signs of making any speedy progress.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

With the Law Commission's proposals for reforming rights of light showing no signs of making any speedy progress, it is no surprise that there have been grumblings from developers and those advising them about the potential for the current narrow and inflexible constraints to hinder the recovery of our property market. Fortunately, the Supreme Court appears to have heard these complaints and it recently took the opportunity in Coventry v Lawrence (2014) - a claim about noise nuisance rather than rights of light – to signal that the recent decisions of the courts on assessing whether to grant an injunction have taken a wrong turn.

Recent history

The difficulties with the law in this area started with the first Court of Appeal decision on rights of light since 1975 - Regan v Paul Properties DPF No.1 Ltd (2007). In that case, the Court confirmed that an injunction should be the primary remedy where there has been an infringement of a property right and applied the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from