Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JUNE 2024

Winding-Up Versus Arbitration Agreements: A Victory For Petitioning Creditors

Macfarlanes LLP
Macfarlanes LLP
Contributor
Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes is a distinctive London-based law firm with a unique combination of services built and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Macfarlanes LLP

The Privy Council's decision in Sian Participation Corp v Halimeda International Ltd makes it easier to wind up companies with debts subject to arbitration agreements or foreign court jurisdictions, overturning the restrictive precedent set by Salford Estates.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Winding up companies where the underlying debt is subject to an arbitration agreement or the exclusive jurisdiction of a court outside England and Wales has now become easier. This is the result of the Privy Council's recent decision in Sian Participation Corp (in liquidation) v Halimeda International Ltd [2024] UKPC 16 (Sian).

When a creditor seeks to place a company into compulsory liquidation by presenting a winding up petition it will have to satisfy the court hearing the petition that the unpaid debt is not genuinely disputed on substantial grounds. When the debt forming the basis of the winding up petition is subject to an arbitration agreement the question arises as to whether the court hearing the petition or an arbitrator should decide whether that debt is genuinely disputed on substantial grounds.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from