Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 AUGUST 2007

The Recoverability Of Settlements

The High Court has recently analysed the authorities on the circumstances in which amounts paid by way of settlement to a claimant can form the basis of a claim for recovery from third parties and should be taken as the measure of damages.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Liam O'Connell
Liam O'Connell
Oliver Shestopal
Oliver Shestopal

The High Court has recently analysed the authorities on the circumstances in which amounts paid by way of settlement to a claimant can form the basis of a claim for recovery from third parties and should be taken as the measure of damages. In a decision handed down on 27 June 2007, the Court held that:

  • provided that a settlement is reasonable on the facts, it can be recovered from a third party even in the absence of liability in law; however,
  • in the event of an unreasonable settlement on the facts, recovery will be limited to the true measure of loss.

The case (John F Hunt Demolition Limited v ASME Engineering Limited) clarifies the proper application of the principles set down in Biggin & Co Limited v Permanite Limited, and provides useful guidance both to professionals seeking to recover, from their sub-agents or other third parties, sums paid to a principal, and to liability insurers acquiring rights of subrogation from their professional insureds, on the vexed

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from