Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2026

The Prestige: Supreme Court Clarifies The “conditional Benefit Principle”

The Supreme Court has clarified a crucial principle in insurance law regarding third parties who seek to enforce contractual rights while circumventing arbitration clauses. In The Prestige case, the Court examined whether insurers can recover damages when third parties breach their obligation to arbitrate by pursuing claims through court proceedings instead. This landmark ruling establishes the nature of remedies available when the conditional benefit principle is violated.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Michael Volikas
Michael Volikas
Amanda Urwin
Amanda Urwin
Alice Hoare
Alice Hoare

The Supreme Court today unanimously allowed the London P&I Club’s (the "Club") appeal in The Prestige [2026] UKSC 36, and in doing so clarified that a third party pursuing direct action contractual rights contrary to an arbitration clause contained in an insurance contract may be liable in common law damages by reason of the application of the "conditional benefit principle".

The "conditional benefit principle" prevents a third party from taking the benefit of a contract without accepting the relevant burden. For example, a third party asserting rights derived from an insurance contract containing an arbitration clause must pursue those rights in arbitration, not through court proceedings. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from