Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 NOVEMBER 2023

Rethinking Safeguards In Arbitration?

Bracewell LLP
Bracewell LLP
Contributor
Bracewell LLP

Bracewell LLP

Paris is a vital energy hub in Europe, and our Paris office plays a central role in helping address...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bracewell LLP

In The Federal Republic of Nigeria v Process & Industrial Developments Limited [2023] EWHC 2638 (Comm) the Commercial Court determined that arbitration awards...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In The Federal Republic of Nigeria v Process & Industrial Developments Limited [2023] EWHC 2638 (Comm) the Commercial Court determined that arbitration awards against Nigeria had been obtained by fraud and were contrary to public policy. This decision is of the utmost importance to Nigeria given the sums involved. However, it will also be of interest to companies and state entities which have provided for arbitration in their contracts, as it raises questions as to the efficacy of arbitration as a dispute resolution process.

Background

In 2010, the Federal Government of Nigeria (Nigeria) and Process & Industrial Developments Limited (P&ID) entered into a long-term Gas Supply Processing Agreement for Accelerated Gas Development (GSPA). Under the GSPA, Nigeria was to supply specified quantities of 'wet' gas to Gas Processing Facilities constructed by P&ID at Calabar. Nigeria failed to supply any wet gas, and P&ID failed to construct the Gas Processing Facilities.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from