Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 AUGUST 2026

Premier Modular Ltd v Maidstone And Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust

Fenwick Elliott LLP
Fenwick Elliott LLP
Contributor
Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott provides a comprehensive range of legal services on every aspect of the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fenwick Elliott LLP

A construction adjudication case examines whether an adjudicator breached natural justice by determining a compensation event based on contractual provisions neither party argued. The Trust challenged enforcement of a £1.6 million decision, claiming the adjudicator decided the dispute on grounds the parties never had opportunity to address.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

PML sought summary enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision in the sum of £1.6 million. The Trust said that the central findings in that decision were reached in breach of natural justice. In particular, the Trust said that the adjudicator’s finding that there had been a Compensation Event was made on a contractual basis that had not been raised by the parties and on which neither party had made submissions. Further, the adjudicator made a finding that the Accepted Programme had been updated, but this was not part of the adjudication and was contrary to the position of both parties.

In other words, the adjudicator had decided the dispute on a basis with which the responding party (i.e. the Trust) did not have an adequate opportunity to deal with. Deputy Judge Wiliamson KC referred to the case of Roe Brickwork Ltd v Wates Construction Ltd (see Dispatch 163), where Edwards-Stuart J had said:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from