Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JULY 2021

Litigation Round-up June 2021

Mills & Reeve LLP
Mills & Reeve LLP
Contributor

Mills & Reeve LLP

Mills & Reeve’s staff thrive on developing great relationships and love helping clients find...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mills & Reeve LLP

The court is unable to waive late or defective service of a claim form as a procedural error under CPR 3.10. It can do so under CPR 6.15 and 6.16 where there is "good reason" but this jurisdiction was not invoked by the claimant...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Service of claim forms 

The court is unable to waive late or defective service of a claim form as a procedural error under CPR 3.10. It can do so under CPR 6.15 and 6.16 where there is "good reason" but this jurisdiction was not invoked by the claimant, presumably because case law makes clear that it does not apply to mistakes such as forgetting to serve the claim form along with the particulars of claim (Boxwood Leisure Ltd v Gleeson Construction Services Ltd).

Summary judgment and defence 

There is no requirement under CPR 15 for a defendant to file a defence where it makes a strike out or summary judgment application. Where a summary judgment application is made on the basis of a question of law, there is no requirement for the evidence in support of the application to contain a statement as to the absence of a real prospect of success (King v Stiefel).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from