Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 OCTOBER 2020

Is Summary Judgment Worth The Gamble?

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Betfred argue there was a software error and its terms and conditions mean it is not liable to make the payment.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Andy Green  thought he had won £1,722,923.54 online  in January 2018 playing a Betfred blackjack game on his phone.

Betfred argue there was a software error and its terms and conditions mean it is not liable to make the payment.

Mr Green has taken the case to court and we understand that he has made an application for summary judgment which is being heard by the High Court in October. An application for summary judgment can be a high-risk strategy because it will be necessary to satisfy the judge that Betfred has no real prospect of successfully defending its position at a full trial. Given there will not be a chance for a full examination of the evidence at a summary judgment application, we understand that to be successful, Mr Green will have to convince the judge that he would win taking into account Betfred's case as it's been presented to the Court; namely that the blackjack game malfunctioned in some way. In other words, Mr Green will be arguing that it is

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from