Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 APRIL 2009

Failure To Remove Claims – They Are Defendable!

Browne Jacobson LLP
Browne Jacobson LLP
Contributor
Browne Jacobson LLP

Browne Jacobson LLP

We’re Browne Jacobson. The law firm for positive impact across business and society. Social and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Browne Jacobson LLP

His Honour Judge Birtles handed down Judgment in an important failure to remove case last Friday: TF –v- LB Lewisham.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sarah Swan
Sarah Swan

His Honour Judge Birtles handed down Judgment in an important failure to remove case last Friday: TF –v- LB Lewisham. As far as we are aware, this was only the second case of this nature going to trial; the first being Pierce –v- Doncaster MBC [2008].

Facts

The Claimant (TF) was born in 1984. From birth there were concerns about her mother's ability to care for her and a social worker was appointed to the family. The Claimant was taken into Lewisham's care in December 1988 and later placed with a foster parent, Mrs B. In May 1989 the Claimant was returned to her mother's care on a 2 month trial basis. It failed. The Claimant returned to Mrs B's care in July 1989.

In August 1990 the Claimant was placed with a prospective adoptive parent, Mrs E. The following month the Claimant made disclosures to Mrs E of serious sexual abuse by RD, a friend of her mother's. In 1992 the Claimant disclosed sexual abuse by Mrs B's son, LB. Lewisham provided the Claimant and Mrs E

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from