Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 APRIL 2025

Earnout Submissions Challenged

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

The High Court has ruled that earn-out calculations, emailed by the buyer to the sellers in relation to a share sale, were not validly communicated.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The High Court has ruled that earn-out calculations, emailed by the buyer to the sellers in relation to a share sale, were not validly communicated.

Earnout calculations and notice provisions

Under an earnout provision in a share purchase agreement, the buyer was required to "submit" its revenue determinations to the sellers. It did so by email. Initially for Year 1 post completion and then for Year 2. The sellers pointed out that email was not a valid method of service under the formal notice provisions. The buyers tried to argue these provisions did not apply to the draft revenue determinations but only to formal notices under the SPA. The court disagreed. The words used in the notice provisions—which referred to "any notice or other communication"—were extremely widely drafted; it would be undesirable to draw fine distinctions between different forms of communication (e.g., formal notices served under the SPA and these revenue determinations); and it would be

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from