Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 DECEMBER 2025

Do Non-Bank Financial Institutions Pose A Systemic Risk?

Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Contributor
Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has approximately 3,200 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Greenberg Traurig

This is the fourth in our series of GT Alerts reporting on the House of Lords Financial Services Regulatory Committee (the Committee) inquiry into the non-bank financial institutions (NBFI) sector.

United KingdomFinance and Banking

This is the fourth in our series of GT Alerts reporting on the House of Lords Financial Services Regulatory Committee (the Committee) inquiry into the non-bank financial institutions (NBFI) sector.

Our first three GT Alerts have focussed, in some detail, on whether banks and NBFIs should be treated differently from a prudential regulation perspective. The evidence provided to the Committee by a number of witnesses has identified that banks, as a result of being authorised to take deposits from the public and by providing access to the money transmission systems, are in a different position from NBFIs and, to that extent, arguably have less systemic significance. Investors in NBFIs, debt funds in particular, have access to information and the ability to undertake due diligence on the debt fund advisors and negotiate the investment parameters.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from