Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JANUARY 2008

Just Not Cricket

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Hair’s QC argued that he was treated less favourablly because of his race and that the ICC was therefore liablie under the Race Relations Act. The ICC is reported to have spent £250,000 defending the claim. Hair can hope to return to top level umpiring with the added bonus of the protection under RRA 1976 up his sleeve.

United KingdomEmployment and HR
Will Nash
Will Nash

Nick Hurley is a partner and Will Nash a solicitor in Charles Russell LLP's employment and sports group.

Reconciliation or sell out? Nick Hurley and Will Nash review the collapse of Darrell Hair's discrimination claim.

In Brief

Hair's QC argued that he was treated less favourablly because of his race and that the ICC was therefore liablie under the Race Relations Act, ss 1(1) and 3A.

The ICC is reported to have spent £250,000 defending the claim.

Hair can hope to return to top level umpiring with the added bonus of the protection under RRA 1976 up his sleeve.

The recent collapse of cricket umpire Darrell Hair's discrimination claim was as surprising as it was well publicised. Umpire Hair's high profile in the international cricketing world resulted in his tribunal claim receiving broad coverage across the international media. Cricket took a rare centre stage in the world of sport

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from