Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 OCTOBER 2018

Can Workers On Zero Hour Contracts Be Considered Agency Workers?

Freeths LLP
Freeths LLP
Contributor
Freeths LLP

Freeths LLP

Freeths is one of the UK’s leading, full-service, commercial law firms, with 1,000+ freethinking,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Freeths LLP

If zero hour contracts are part of the business model for your organisation, this interesting case may highlight a need for clarity over the terms on which these workers are engaged.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Case won by security guard on zero hour contract who claimed he was an agency worker

If zero hour contracts are part of the business model for your organisation, this interesting case may highlight a need for clarity over the terms on which these workers are engaged. Businesses who send contractors to work for their clients on a temporary basis could face similar claims.

Matei v Brooknight Guarding Limited

After the termination of a 21-month engagement, a security guard with a zero hour contract argued that he was an agency worker. His employer required him to work temporarily at different sites for different clients, but primarily for one facilities management company. The security guard claimed that, as an agency worker, he should have received the same terms and conditions of employment as the permanent employees he worked alongside after 12 weeks' service, including the same pay.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from