Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MAY 2026

Supply Chain Disruption – Again

Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Contributor
Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring’s Doha office is a full service legal practice that serves as the firm’s regional...

View firm profile
Explore more from Crowell & Moring LLP

Businesses affected by the Strait of Hormuz crisis are likely to be navigating both sides of the contractual liability equation: seeking to enforce protections while simultaneously trying to limit their own exposure.

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

What You Need to Know

  • Key takeaway #1

    Force majeure is not automatic under English law. There is no implied right to force majeure; the clause must exist in the contract and be interpreted strictly on its own terms. Businesses must carefully review the specific language of each clause, paying close attention to requirements around foreseeability, prevention of performance, mitigation obligations, and notice procedures, as failure to comply with any of these can extinguish the right to invoke the clause entirely.

  • Key takeaway #2

    Frustration is a high bar and unlikely to provide relief in most cases. Where no force majeure clause exists or provides relief, parties may look to the doctrine of frustration, but courts set a demanding threshold; mere increased cost or delay is insufficient. As illustrated by the Tsakiroglou case, which held that the closure of the Suez Canal did not frustrate a contract because goods could still be shipped via an alternative route, frustration

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from