Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2013

Lessons In Losec: The Astrazeneca Dominance Decision

Fieldfisher
Fieldfisher
Contributor
Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher is a European law firm with market-leading practices in many of the world’s most...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fieldfisher

A discussion on the unsurprising December decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the AstraZeneca case.

United KingdomAntitrust/Competition Law
Publications Field Fisher Waterhouse
Publications Field Fisher Waterhouse

Introduction

December's decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") in the AstraZeneca case is unsurprising: the Court refused AstraZeneca's application to have the General Court's decision set aside (AstraZeneca v. Commission1). The General Court last year essentially upheld the European Commission's decision of 20052, which found AstraZeneca guilty of having abused dominance by using its IPRs and the pharmaceutical regulatory system to prevent or delay the marketing of generic versions of its ulcer treatment drug, Losec.

The Commission's original infringement decision3 was seminal. It was the first abuse of dominance case in the pharmaceutical sector and remains to this day the only abuse decision that the Commission has taken in respect of a pharmaceutical company.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from