Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 FEBRUARY 2012

Consequences Of Liberating The Limitation

On 17 August 2011 the Draft Road Accident Fund Amendment Bill, 2011, was published for comment.

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Rene Makue
Rene Makue

Personal Injury News January 2012

When the Constitutional Court declared that sections 18(1)(a)(i), 18(1)(b) and 18(2) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 (the old Act) were unconstitutional (Mvumvu and Others v Minister of Transport and Another 2011 (5) BCLR 488 (CC)), they suspended the order for a period of 18 months to enable Parliament to cure the defect.

On 17 August 2011 the Draft Road Accident Fund Amendment Bill, 2011, was published for comment. It appears that the aim of the draft Bill is to amend the Act, so as to provide for transitional measures in respect of certain categories of third parties whose claims were limited under the Act, as instructed by the Constitutional Court. The proposed amendment includes removal of the existing section 18 and substituting same through the insertion of section 18A of the Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from