Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 DECEMBER 2016

Passing Off In Namibia

The High Court has made it clear that it takes IP seriously, that English and South African IP decisions are very relevant, and that anyone alleging passing off will need to submit compelling evidence.

NamibiaIntellectual Property

In a rare IP law decision in Namibia, the High Court has made it clear that it takes IP seriously, that English and South African IP decisions are very relevant, and that anyone alleging passing off will need to submit compelling evidence to establish that they have the necessary reputation.

The decision in the case of Mega Power Centre CC trading as Talisman Plant & Tool Hire v Talisman Franchise Operations (Pty) Ltd and Others was handed down on 28 October 2016 (there was an earlier decision, which we have reported on previously). The facts of the case were straightforward. A Namibian businessman started a plant tool hire business in 2006 under the name Talisman Plant and Tool Hire. At the time, he had been aware that there was a company in neighbouring South Africa that offered a similar service under the name Talisman, but his investigations showed that this company had never done business in Namibia. In 2013, the businessman learned that a competitor business

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from