Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 AUGUST 2023

Cross Charge Vs ISD: An Attempt To Settle The Unsettled

Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Contributor
Khaitan & Co.

Khaitan & Co.

Founded in 1911, Khaitan & Co is a heritage law firm that has been a trusted adviser to leading...

View firm profile
Explore more from Khaitan & Co.

In the modern-day business landscape, companies are setting up their Head Office (HO) in one State and setting up various branch offices (BO) all over India to operate their business efficiently.

IndiaTax

Introduction

In the modern-day business landscape, companies are setting up their Head Office (HO) in one State and setting up various branch offices (BO) all over India to operate their business efficiently. Insofar as the GST law is concerned, such offices at different States are considered as distinct persons and have different GST registrations. In such a model, there exists a concept of cost-centres where the common expenditure incurred at HO is expensed and shared to the BOs. Distribution of input tax credit (ITC) on such common expenditure is being done either through Input Service Distributor (ISD) mechanism or by way of cross-charge.

Controversy

The industry has been perennially marred with the controversy of distribution of ITC through ISD mechanism vis-à-vis cross charge with the Revenue authorities questioning the manner of distribution for each route. The GST Advance ruling authorities have also pronounced contradictory rulings further complicating

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this document does not necessarily reflect the views / position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up, please contact Khaitan & Co at [email protected].

See more popular content from