Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JULY 2023

Twitter's Case: A Cautionary Tale For Social Media Companies

Majmudar & Partners
Majmudar & Partners
Contributor
Majmudar & Partners

Majmudar & Partners

Majmudar & Partners, established in 1943, is one of India’s premier law firms representing leading...

View firm profile
Explore more from Majmudar & Partners

In the case of X Corp. v. Union of India (W.P. No. 13710 of 2022), the Karnataka High Court recently dismissed a writ petition filed by Twitter, Inc. ("Twitter") against certain blocking...

IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

In the case of X Corp. v. Union of India (W.P. No. 13710 of 2022), the Karnataka High Court recently dismissed a writ petition filed by Twitter, Inc. ("Twitter") against certain blocking orders issued to Twitter by the Indian government under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (the "IT Act"). In so doing, the court held that Twitter, despite being a non-citizen entity, could rely on Article 14 of India's Constitution (Right to Equality) and, on this basis, it had the locus standi to file a writ. Importantly, the court upheld the government's power to have entire Twitter accounts blocked under Section 69A of the IT Act, as compared to specific tweets only, and ruled that the law did not require reasons for blocking to be communicated, although that would be preferable.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from