Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 APRIL 2013

TMT Flash - April 2013

PSA
Explore more from PSA

The Supreme Court has recently directed Bharati Airtel, India's largest mobile service provider, not to extend its third generation high speed data services for new customers in seven circles where it failed to obtain requisite licenses from Department of Telecommunication.

IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Krishna Jhala
Krishna Jhala
Neeraj Dubey
Neeraj Dubey
Author LinkedIn connections

Supreme Court banned Bharati Airtel from enrolling new customers for 3G services in seven circles

SC in its order dated April 11, 2013 has directed Bharati Airtel, India's largest mobile service provider, not to extend its third generation (3G) high speed data services for new customers in seven circles where it failed to obtain requisite licenses from Department of Telecommunication ("DoT"). The seven circles are Kolkata, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh East and Kerala. However, the said decision does not affect the existing customers and the Bharati Airtel shall continue to provide 3G services through its mutually beneficial agreements entered with other mobile service providers, namely, Vodafone & Idea. The said agreements are the subject matter of the issue. According to DoT, Bharati Airtel is in  violation of rules and has issued notices to Bharati Airtel to stop providing 3G services in the aforesaid seven circles and also imposed a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Instagram’s 2026 AI Labelling Rules

Instagram's 2026 policy shift introduces mandatory AI-generated profile labels and penalties for non-disclosure, creating new compliance challenges at the intersection of platform governance and India's statutory framework for synthetically generated information. How do these overlapping regimes affect brands, influencers, and content creators operating in India's digital ecosystem?
IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)
Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)
Article

Telegram Ban In India – The Rise Of Digital Sovereignty

The Delhi High Court's landmark ruling in Telegram FZ LLC v. Union of India addresses whether Section 69A of the IT Act permits the government to block an entire platform rather than specific content. Following the NEET-UG 2026 paper leak scandal, where fraudulent channels circulated fake exam papers affecting millions of aspirants, the court upheld the Centre's power to impose a platform-wide ban on Telegram, sparking intense debate about the boundaries between examination integrity and digital censorship.
IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Hammurabi & Solomon Partners
Hammurabi & Solomon Partners
Article

The Promotion And Regulation Of Online Gaming Act, 2025 And The Promotion And Regulation Of Online Gaming Rules, 2026

The Act, the Rules and the OGAI are therefore simultaneously operational. The prohibition provisions under Chapter III of the Act, the criminal penalties under Chapter V of the Act and the institutional framework under the Rules are all in effect. There is effectively no formal compliance window for core prohibitions and penalties; stakeholders should treat the regime as immediately operational and adjust business models without delay.
IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
King, Stubb & Kasiva
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Article

Is Meta Still Just An Intermediary? Why India Is Rethinking Safe Harbour

In mid-September 2026, government sources said Meta Platforms’ Indian operations, Facebook, Instagram and Threads, should no longer be viewed merely as an “internet intermediary” but should also be treated as a “service provider,” arguing that the company’s monetised algorithms actively decide what content gets amplified, distributed and shown to whom. That is a government position, not a new statutory classification, and this article returns to that distinction below.
IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

DOT Notifies Telecom Network Authorisation Rules, 2026: What Has Changed?

On 20 July 2026, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) notified the Telecommunications (Authorisation for Telecommunication Network) Rules, 2026 (Rules). The Rules operationalise Section 3(1)(b) of the Telecommunications Act, 2023 and establish a framework for six categories of telecommunication network authorisations: infrastructure provider (IP) (formerly, IP-I), digital connectivity infrastructure provider (DCIP), internet exchange point (IXP) provider, satellite earth station gateway (SESG) provider, cloud-hosted telecommunication network (CTN) provider and mobile number portability (MNP) provider.
IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Article

Retention Clauses Under Scrutiny: Enforcing Service Bonds In India

Indian courts are increasingly treating service bonds as legitimate commercial tools rather than automatic restraints on employment. When an employee leaves prematurely after receiving training or specialized benefits, can employers enforce bonds requiring compensation? This analysis examines the evolving judicial framework that determines when service bonds are valid, what evidence employers must provide, and how courts calculate recoverable damages when bonds are breached.
IndiaEmployment and HR
PSA
PSA
Article

Resetting The Clock – Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2026

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 (“Amendment Act”) received Presidential assent on April 6, 2026, marking the most significant reform to India’s insolvency framework since the original enactment of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code’s (“IBC”) in 2016 (and has yet to become law). Over the last decade, the IBC has transformed India’s insolvency landscape by improving creditor recoveries, shifting control from defaulting promoters to creditors and creating a modern regulatory framework where none existed before.
IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
PSA
PSA
Article

Confidentiality: Enforceability Of Post-Employment Obligations

Indian courts have consistently upheld confidentiality obligations while striking down post-employment non-compete clauses, but the enforceability of these protections depends on precise contractual drafting and demonstrable evidence of misuse. This analysis examines landmark cases that define the boundaries between protectable trade secrets and an employee's general skills, revealing what businesses must establish to secure legal protection when confidential information is compromised.
IndiaEmployment and HR
PSA
PSA
Article

Intermediaries: A New Playbook Beyond Passive Compliance

Intermediary liability in India is governed by section 79 of the Information Technology Act (“IT Act”).This section provides safe harbour protection to intermediaries for third-party information, subject to compliance with due diligence obligations under the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (“IT Intermediary Rules”), particularly Part II, which governs intermediary conduct. On March 30, 2026, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (“MeitY”) released draft amendments for public consultation.
IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
PSA
PSA