Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 NOVEMBER 2006

Broadcasting Services Regulation Bill

Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe
Explore more from Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe

In light of the judgement of the Supreme Court of India in Government of India & Ors v/s Cricket Association of Bengal & Ors directing that airwaves or frequencies are public property and have to be controlled and regulated by a public authority in the promotion of the general interest of the public, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting ("MIB") had been contemplating the enactment of a legislation for regulating the operation of broadcasting services in India.

IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Shardul Thacker
Shardul Thacker

In light of the judgement of the Supreme Court of India in Government of India & Ors v/s Cricket Association of Bengal & Ors directing that airwaves or frequencies are public property and have to be controlled and regulated by a public authority in the promotion of the general interest of the public, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting ("MIB") had been contemplating the enactment of a legislation for regulating the operation of broadcasting services in India.

Accordingly, MIB has proposed a draft of the legislation – the Broadcasting Services Regulation Bill (the "Bill") in order to achieve the following basic objectives:

  • To promote, facilitate and develop in an orderly manner the carriage and content of broadcasting.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Instagram’s 2026 AI Labelling Rules

Instagram's 2026 policy shift introduces mandatory AI-generated profile labels and penalties for non-disclosure, creating new compliance challenges at the intersection of platform governance and India's statutory framework for synthetically generated information. How do these overlapping regimes affect brands, influencers, and content creators operating in India's digital ecosystem?
IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)
Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)
Article

Instagram’s 2026 AI Labelling Rules: What Brands, Influencers And Creators In India Need To Know

On 31 August 2026, Instagram renamed its “AI creator” badge as the “AI-generated profile” label and announced that accounts featuring an AI-generated person without the label may see their reach limited. Seven weeks on, the question I hear most from clients, whether they are brands, agencies or individual creators, is a fair one: is this merely a platform housekeeping matter, or does it carry legal consequences in India?
IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Legitpro Law
Legitpro Law
Article

Telegram Ban In India – The Rise Of Digital Sovereignty

The Delhi High Court's landmark ruling in Telegram FZ LLC v. Union of India addresses whether Section 69A of the IT Act permits the government to block an entire platform rather than specific content. Following the NEET-UG 2026 paper leak scandal, where fraudulent channels circulated fake exam papers affecting millions of aspirants, the court upheld the Centre's power to impose a platform-wide ban on Telegram, sparking intense debate about the boundaries between examination integrity and digital censorship.
IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Hammurabi & Solomon Partners
Hammurabi & Solomon Partners
Article

The Promotion And Regulation Of Online Gaming Act, 2025 And The Promotion And Regulation Of Online Gaming Rules, 2026

The Act, the Rules and the OGAI are therefore simultaneously operational. The prohibition provisions under Chapter III of the Act, the criminal penalties under Chapter V of the Act and the institutional framework under the Rules are all in effect. There is effectively no formal compliance window for core prohibitions and penalties; stakeholders should treat the regime as immediately operational and adjust business models without delay.
IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
King, Stubb & Kasiva
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Article

Is Meta Still Just An Intermediary? Why India Is Rethinking Safe Harbour

In mid-September 2026, government sources said Meta Platforms’ Indian operations, Facebook, Instagram and Threads, should no longer be viewed merely as an “internet intermediary” but should also be treated as a “service provider,” arguing that the company’s monetised algorithms actively decide what content gets amplified, distributed and shown to whom. That is a government position, not a new statutory classification, and this article returns to that distinction below.
IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.