Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JANUARY 2020

Why I Generally Do Not Recommend Arbitration In India?

Arbitration is broadly defined as a non-judicial process of resolving disputes. The key word here is "non-judicial", meaning outside the rigid structures of court processes.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Arbitration is broadly defined as a non-judicial process of resolving disputes. The key word here is "non-judicial", meaning outside the rigid structures of court processes.

Yet, experience shows that predominantly in India (and to some extent even elsewhere in the world), the judicial process is deeply inter-twined within the arbitration process because parties typically choose or are offered retired judges as arbitrators and parties almost always engage batteries of senior lawyers to represent them. This has a two-fold effect on the arbitration process. Judges can rarely give up their years of judicial discipline and rigor, and therefore require parties to follow a process which is not too dissimilar to a judicial process. Similarly, lawyers are unable to move away from their legal training and therefore, present all the legal technicalities in arbitration as they would in a courtroom, and of courses the ex-judge arbitrator allows it. This means that in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from