Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2022

Tracking Down The Courts In The Interplay Between The Arbitration Act, 1996 And The MSMED Act, 2006: Who Overrides Whom?

Kachwaha & Partners
Kachwaha & Partners
Contributor
Kachwaha & Partners

Kachwaha & Partners

Founded in 2002, Kachwaha & Partners is a multi-discipline, full service law firm with its main...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kachwaha & Partners

Party autonomy principle allows parties to an agreement to decide the mode of settlement of disputes and the procedure involved therein.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kachwaha & Partners
Kachwaha & Partners
Author LinkedIn connections

Abstract:

In current times, almost all commercial contracts have an arbitration clause, so, do the contracts between micro, small and medium enterprises (the "MSME") i.e. supplier and non-MSME i.e. buyer. The arbitration clauses are governed by Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the "Arbitration Act") in India. However, for the protection and benefit of MSMEs, Indian Parliament has enacted a separate piece of legislation called Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (the "MSMED Act"). The MSMED Act under Section 18 provides arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism while simultaneously overriding the Arbitration Act. The Supreme Court in Principal Chief Engineer v. M/s Manibhai and Brothers (Sleepers) has held that the provisions of the MSMED Act shall prevail over the arbitration clause. However, there are few circumstances when the arbitration clause would prevail over the MSMED Act when the reference to the arbitration clause is made

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from