Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 OCTOBER 2023

Making A Case For The Unilateral Optional Clause: A Jurisprudential Analysis

Kachwaha & Partners
Kachwaha & Partners
Contributor
Kachwaha & Partners

Kachwaha & Partners

Founded in 2002, Kachwaha & Partners is a multi-discipline, full service law firm with its main...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kachwaha & Partners

Natasha is a student of NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad and Winner of the 1st Prize of the 9th Ed. of Arb Excel Essay Writing Competition.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kachwaha & Partners
Kachwaha & Partners
Author LinkedIn connections

Abstract

Does a unilateral right to invoke arbitration invalidate the arbitration agreement? In the seven decades since the issue first arose for the courts' consideration, there has been no consensus between the High Courts. This essay argues that the judicial recognition of such a right would be consistent with existing Indian jurisprudence. To do so, it first discusses the legal history of clauses such a conferring a right in India, culling out both the prevailing and potential grounds on such clauses can be opposed. On the basis of a discussion of these grounds, it concludes that courts can check the substantial and procedural soundness of unilateral option clauses to give better effect to party autonomy and mutual consent.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from