Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2018

Single Color Not Protectable As Trademark

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Contributor
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

At Fross Zelnick, we secure and defend our clients’ most valuable assets—their brands, designs, and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

The High Court of Delhi held in July 2018 that the designer's red sole is not protectable as a trademark in India

IndiaIntellectual Property

Christian Louboutin SAS v. Abubaker & Ors, No. 890/2018 (May 25, 2018)

One step forward and one step back. Such is the path for Christian Louboutin in his ongoing battle to enforce trademark rights in his famous red sole around the world. The High Court of Delhi held in July 2018 that the designer's red sole is not protectable as a trademark in India. The decision came shortly before the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") came to the opposite conclusion. According to the Delhi High Court, a single color is not capable of trademark protection.

In 2016, Louboutin brought an infringement action in India against retailers that colored the soles of women's footwear red before selling them. Louboutin alleged infringement by passing off and sought an injunction and damages. The High Court of Delhi held that Louboutin failed to state a cause of action because its registered trademark was incapable of protection under Indian trademark law.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from