Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 OCTOBER 2014

The Sherlock Holmes Copyright Case

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Contributor
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

At Fross Zelnick, we secure and defend our clients’ most valuable assets—their brands, designs, and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

The Seventh Circuit held that the copyright protection of a fictional character cannot be extended beyond the expiration of the copyright for a work in which the character first appeared.

United StatesIntellectual Property
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Author LinkedIn connections

Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd., 755 F.3d 496 (7th Cir. 2014)

The Seventh Circuit recently issued its decision in Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd., holding that the copyright protection of a fictional character cannot be extended beyond the expiration of the copyright for a work in which the character first appeared just because the author altered the character in a subsequent work that still enjoyed copyright protection.

The case concerned the Sherlock Holmes stories authored by Arthur Conan Doyle. Doyle published fifty-six Sherlock Holmes stories and four Sherlock Holmes novels between 1887 and 1927. 755 F.3d at 497. Except for ten stories published between 1923 and 1927, all of the stories and novels are now in the public domain. Id. Thus, they can be copied and sold without a license from Doyle's estate. Several years ago, plaintiff-appellee Leslie Klinger, believing that he did not need a license, co-edited an anthology that contained works by various

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from