Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JUNE 2025

Real Time Relief In Protecting The Copyright And Broadcast Reproduction Rights

Clasis Law
Explore more from Clasis Law

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court granted superlative injunction which has been referred to as an extended version of dynamic+ injunction while deciding an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2...

IndiaIntellectual Property
Sidhant Pandita
Sidhant Pandita
Sheena Tyagi
Sheena Tyagi
Author LinkedIn connections

Introduction

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court1 granted superlative injunction which has been referred to as an extended version of dynamic+ injunction while deciding an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, filed by Star India Pvt. Ltd. ("the Plaintiff") against IPTV Smarter Pro and others ("the Defendants") concerning copyright infringement by the Defendants for the content produced and owned by the Plaintiff.

Facts of the Case

The Plaintiff had filed a suit before Delhi High Court, seeking a permanent injunction against Defendants from infringing the copyright and broadcast reproduction rights of the Plaintiff. Initially, the Court granted an ex-parte ad interim injunction on 10.02.2025,2 against the Defendants mentioned in the memo of parties and directed the domain name registrars and internet service providers (ISPs) to block access to infringing domains and URLs. In the said order, the Court further directed that if

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Copy, Right? ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

When an artificial intelligence system is trained on copyrighted news content, and later answers a user’s question using what it learned, has the law been broken? On 24th July 2026, the Delhi High Court answered that question, at least for now. In ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Justice Amit Bansal declined to grant an interim injunction against OpenAI, holding, on a prima facie, interim stage view, that the company’s use of ANI’s news content to train its large language models (“LLMs”) falls within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957
IndiaIntellectual Property
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

AI Training Data, Copyright Risk And Commercial Liability: What Businesses Need To Know

On 8 October 2026, USA Today Co. and its affiliated newspaper companies, which publish 19 titles including USA Today, the Detroit Free Press and The Arizona Republic, sued seven OpenAI entities in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that OpenAI copied their journalism to train its models, stripped identifying information from it, and now uses those models to give ChatGPT users summaries that substitute for the original reporting. The publishers seek more than USD 250 million in damages, an injunction and an order for the destruction of models and training sets containing their content.
IndiaIntellectual Property
Legitpro Law
Legitpro Law
Article

India’s DPDP Consent Management Architecture Form November 2026

India’s data protection framework has continued to evolve since the enactment of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (the “DPDP Act”) and the subsequent introduction of the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules (the “Rules”) (together, the “DPDP regime”). The broader framework, including the applicability and commencement timeline, processing of personal data based on consent, recognition of consent managers and obligations of data fiduciaries, has already been discussed in our earlier article.
IndiaPrivacy
Clasis Law
Clasis Law
Article

India's Labour Codes Enter The Compliance Phase: Key Implications Of The Central Rules, 2026

India's labour law reforms entered a significant phase with the enforcement of the Code on Wages, 2019, the Code on Social Security, 2020, the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 (collectively, the “Labour Codes”) from November 21, 2025. Although the Labour Codes came into force in November 2025, their implementation remained incomplete in the absence of the corresponding subordinate legislation.
IndiaEmployment and HR
Clasis Law
Clasis Law
Article

The Employee’s Enrolment Campaign, 2026, Vishwas, 2026, And Amnesty, 2026: A Step Towards Bridging India’s Social Security Compliance Gap

India is presently witnessing one of the most significant labour law reforms in decades with the implementation of the four new labour codes. Following their enactment, the Appropriate Governments are progressively operationalising the labour codes through the notification of rules, schemes, and other subordinate legislation.
IndiaEmployment and HR
Clasis Law
Clasis Law
Article

The Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2026: Key Changes To The Regulatory Framework

The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSME Act, 2006) was enacted to facilitate the promotion and development of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs). MSMEs play a critical role in driving economic growth, generating employment, fostering innovation, and contributing significantly to India’s GDP and exports. They continue to serve as a vital pillar of the Indian economy. Over the years, the MSME sector has evolved significantly, driven by technological advancements, the emergence of information technology-enabled systems, and changes in the regulatory landscape.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Clasis Law
Clasis Law