Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JUNE 2024

Phonetic Similarities And Cancellation Petitions

The Delhi High Court adjudicated upon a cancellation petition filed by GSK Consumer Healthcare predicated upon the phonetic, visual, and structural similarities between the plaintiff's mark OTRIVIN / OTRINOZ and the mark OTRINIR, owned by Celebrity Biopharma.

IndiaIntellectual Property

The Delhi High Court adjudicated upon a cancellation petition filed by GSK Consumer Healthcare (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff"), predicated upon the phonetic, visual, and structural similarities between the plaintiff's mark OTRIVIN / OTRINOZ and the mark OTRINIR, owned by Celebrity Biopharma (hereinafter referred to as the respondent). The Court addressed two principal issues: (1) whether the marks in question were deceptively similar and (2) whether the respondent's adoption of the mark was bona fide, thereby determining the merits of the cancellation petition.

Facts of the Case

The plaintiff challenged the validity of the respondent's registration, relying on their prior registered OTRIVIN / OTRINOZ marks, as well as prior adoption and extensive, continuous use. The petitioner asserted that, following the registration of the respondent's mark (which was not opposed by the petitioner due to an oversight), they observed that the respondent's

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from