Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 OCTOBER 2026

Patents – Restoration Application When To Precede Post-Grant Revocation

Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan
Contributor
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan

Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan

Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan (LKS) is a premier full-service Indian law firm specializing in areas...

View firm profile
Explore more from Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that patent revocation proceedings cannot proceed while a restoration application remains pending, setting aside a Controller's order that effectively rendered the restoration process meaningless. The decision addresses a critical procedural question about the interplay between patent restoration and post-grant revocation challenges when renewal fees have lapsed.

IndiaIntellectual Property
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys
Author LinkedIn connections

The Calcutta High Court has set aside an order revoking a patent, holding that the Controller could not decide on a post-grant revocation petition while the patentee’s restoration application was still pending. Controller’s objection that the statute does not provide for any embargo in taking up the revocation application during the pendency of the restoration application was thus rejected.

The patent had lapsed due to non-payment of renewal fees. Pursuant to an order of the High Court of Orissa, the company filed a restoration application, which was directed to be considered within two months. However, before deciding the restoration application, the Controller revoked the patent on a post-grant challenge filed by a third party.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from