Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 DECEMBER 2021

Liabilities Of An Infringer In An Infringement Suit: A Case Analysis

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

In the recent judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 13th December 2021, it was observed that "When an infringer seeks to defend patent infringement on the ground that the patent is invalid...

IndiaIntellectual Property

In the recent judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 13th December 2021, it was observed that "When an infringer seeks to defend patent infringement on the ground that the patent is invalid, the onus to prove the invalidity of patent lies heavily on an infringer and this standard has to be met when applying the Principle of Credibility".

This observation was put forward by Justice C Hari Shankar as he restrained Natco Pharma Limited (defendant) from importing, selling, offering for sale, exporting, or dealing directly or indirectly in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) containing Eltrombopag Olamine (EO).

Facts:

On 27th March 2009, the Patent suit (alternatively be used as suit patent) was originally granted to M/s SmithKline Beecham Corporation (later renamed "GlaxoSmithKline LLC"). According to Novartis, on 5th October 2015, the patent suit was first assigned by GlaxoSmithKline LLC to the Glaxo Group Ltd, by a back-to-back assignment deed. On the same

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from