Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 APRIL 2019

Delhi High Court Rules That Design Cannot Constitute Trademark

The definition of design as mentioned in the Indian Designs Act specifically excludes trademark and relying on this exclusion, the Delhi High Court in a passing off suit filed by Crocs agreed with the prohibition contained in ...

IndiaIntellectual Property

The definition of design as mentioned in the Indian Designs Act specifically excludes trademark and relying on this exclusion, the Delhi High Court in a passing off suit filed by Crocs agreed with the prohibition contained in the Designs Act held that a registered design cannot be a trademark. The features of designs such as shape, configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines or colours applied to any article, even if used as a trade mark, cease to be a trade mark on registration being granted to the same as a design. It was held that once the design registration is obtained, the Registered Proprietor is to be deemed to have surrendered, abandoned, acquiesced and waived all rights to use such features as a trade mark.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from