Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JULY 2021

Critical Analysis Of The Practice Of Regular Granting Of Interim Injunctions

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

It is a known fact that Indian courts, in relation to IPR infringement cases, are prone to granting interim/ex-parte interim injunctions for putting an immediate bar over such an alleged violation.

IndiaIntellectual Property

It is a known fact that Indian courts, in relation to IPR infringement cases, are prone to granting interim/ex-parte interim injunctions for putting an immediate bar over such an alleged violation. However, it has to be taken into account that, as happened in a plethora of cases, the party against whom such an injunction is issued did not actually violate the Intellectual Property Rights of the other party. In such cases, despite the courts providing for due compensation, a party may suffer harms, which might be irreparable, due to the earlier issued interim injunction. In relation to this, the author aims to analyze the unpopular opinion of doing away with interim injunction and submit its own opinions in relation to the same.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from