Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2025

Between Suit Courts And High Courts: Decoding Trademark Rectification After The Tribunal Reforms Act

AZB & Partners
AZB & Partners
Contributor
AZB & Partners

AZB & Partners

AZB & Partners, one of India’s premier law firms was founded in 2004 with a clear purpose to...

View firm profile
Explore more from AZB & Partners

The TRA's amendments have led to significant procedural uncertainties, particularly regarding the initiation of rectification applications in the context of ongoing trademark infringement suits.

IndiaIntellectual Property

Abstract

This article critically examines the interplay between trademark infringement suits before civil courts and the rectification proceedings under the Trademarks Act, 1999, following the enactment of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 (TRA), which abolished the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) and transferred the jurisdiction for trademark rectifications to the High Courts. The TRA's amendments have led to significant procedural uncertainties, particularly regarding the initiation of rectification applications in the context of ongoing trademark infringement suits. Section 124 of the TM Act provides two primary routes for initiating rectification: (i) filing a rectification application before the High Court while seeking a stay from the Suit Court, or (ii) obtaining an adjournment from the Suit Court to file a rectification application if no such proceedings are pending. The article analyses key judicial decisions in the expansive precedents laid down

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from