Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JUNE 2024

Ascertaining The Scope Of Claim Construction For Resolving Patent Infringement Suit

On May 8, 2024, in the case of Guala Closures Spa ("plaintiff") and Agi Greenpac Limited ("defendant"), the single Judge of the Delhi High Court rejected the plaintiff's application for an interim injunction alleging infringement ...

IndiaIntellectual Property

On May 8, 2024, in the case of Guala Closures Spa ("plaintiff") and Agi Greenpac Limited ("defendant"), the single Judge of the Delhi High Court rejected the plaintiff's application for an interim injunction alleging infringement of the plaintiff's patent on the grounds that the defendant's product/closure does not fall within the scope of the claims of the plaintiff's patent. The plaintiff had failed to meet the triple test for the grant of injunction, and the balance of convenience strongly favoured the defendant.

Facts and Submissions

The plaintiff claimed to be a multinational company engaged in the manufacture of closures for spirits, wines, mineral water beverages, olive oil, etc. The plaintiff filed a suit in relation to its grant of patent No. IN'522, titled 'Tamper- Evident Closure with Tear Off Seal", granted on 19th October 2020 in India ("Patent"). The plaintiffs patented its products globally and have had a considerable presence in India since

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from