Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 OCTOBER 2008

Appointment Of New Technical Member To Hear Glivec Appeal

Pursuant to Novartis’ litigation, challenging the appointment of S. Chandrasekaran as the expert Technical Member to hear the matter, the Supreme Court has thrown light on the scenario.

IndiaIntellectual Property

Pursuant to Novartis' litigation, challenging the appointment of S. Chandrasekaran as the expert Technical Member to hear the matter, the Supreme Court has thrown light on the scenario. The Intellectual Property Appellant Board (IPAB) constituted under the provisions of Section 116 of the Patents Act, 1970 provides for the establishment of an Appellate Board and also provides for a Technical Member and the qualifications for such an appointment.

On 2nd April, 2007, Central Government had appointed S. Chandrasekaran as a Technical Member (Patent) of IPAB vide notification of even date. On 3rd April, 2007, a notification was issued whereby 2nd April, 2007 was notified as the date for the transfer of appeals pending before any High Court to IPAB. The appeals were transferred to the IPAB by the High Court vide its order dated 4th April, 2007. Further, Misc. Petition Nos.1 and 2 of 2007 were filed on 16th June, 2007, before the IPAB praying for the appointment of another

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from