Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 APRIL 2025

Intellectual Property Spotlight

Kochhar & Co.
Kochhar & Co.
Contributor
Kochhar & Co.

Kochhar & Co.

Kochhar & Co has one of the largest full service commercial law practices in Bangalore. The firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kochhar & Co.

We are pleased to present the latest edition of our IP Law page, sharing important updates, key developments, and practical insights on Intellectual Property, all tailored to help you stay updated in the field...

IndiaIntellectual Property
Tarvinder Singh
Tarvinder Singh
Neha Garg
Neha Garg
Author LinkedIn connections

INTRODUCTION

We are pleased to present the latest edition of our IP Law page, sharing important updates, key developments, and practical insights on Intellectual Property, all tailored to help you stay updated in the field of Indian Patent Law.

Curated by our IPR Law Practice Group, the page is to keep you updated about the latest developments in this dynamic field.

MADRAS HIGH COURT RULES PROCESS TO PRODUCE ANTIBODIES IN GENETICALLY MODIFIED ANIMALS PATENTABLE

In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court in Kymab Limited v. Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs has held that the process of producing antibodies in genetically modified animals is patentable and does not fall under the exclusions of Section 3(i) of the Indian Patents Act, 1970.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Copy, Right? ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

When an artificial intelligence system is trained on copyrighted news content, and later answers a user’s question using what it learned, has the law been broken? On 24th July 2026, the Delhi High Court answered that question, at least for now. In ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Justice Amit Bansal declined to grant an interim injunction against OpenAI, holding, on a prima facie, interim stage view, that the company’s use of ANI’s news content to train its large language models (“LLMs”) falls within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957
IndiaIntellectual Property
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

Discharge And Framing Of Charge Under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023: Reform Or Restatement?

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) has replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, raising critical questions about whether the law on discharge and framing of charges has fundamentally changed. While the substantive principles remain largely continuous with established jurisprudence, the BNSS introduces important procedural timelines and electronic hearing provisions that courts and advocates must navigate carefully. This analysis examines the continuity of legal standards, the new proc
IndiaCriminal Law
Kochhar & Co.
Kochhar & Co.