Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JULY 2022

SC In Vidharbha Industries - IBC Shall Or May Survive?

The Supreme Court (mostly speaking through Justice (retd.) Nariman) in a series of rulings starting from Innoventive Industries set the jurisprudence for the NCLTs to decide applications filed by financial creditors (FCs) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC").

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Introduction

The Supreme Court (mostly speaking through Justice (retd.) Nariman) in a series of rulings starting from Innoventive Industries set the jurisprudence for the NCLTs to decide applications filed by financial creditors (FCs) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC"). These rulings to a great extent saved the nascent insolvency regime of India and assisted in progressive development of the IBC. Simply put, the Supreme Court in multiple cases has ruled that under Section 7 of the IBC the adjudicating authority is only required to be satisfied that a default has occurred. The moment the adjudicating authority is satisfied that a default has occurred the application must be admitted – a tick box exercise. The Supreme Court's ruling in Vidarbha Industries Power Limited v. Axis Bank Limited1("Vidarbha ") upturns and unsettles the well-established jurisprudence and ignores the Supreme Court's earlier rulings. A brief overview of the pain points.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The above is a generic analysis and should not be regarded as a substitute for specific advice based on the facts of a client’s objectives and specific commercial agreements reached. Please do reach out to us at [email protected] for any queries.

See more popular content from