Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 OCTOBER 2021

Resolution Professional Not Entitled To Success Fee: NCLAT

Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Contributor
Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal is a leading full-service Indian law firm, founded in 2008, providing comprehensive...

View firm profile
Explore more from Phoenix Legal

NCLAT in its recent judgment in Jayesh N. Sanghrajka erstwhile R.P. of Ariisto Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Monitoring Agency nominated by Committee of Creditors of Ariisto Developers Pvt. Ltd. held that a resolution professional ...

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (NCLAT) in its recent judgment in Jayesh N. Sanghrajka erstwhile R.P. of Ariisto Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Monitoring Agency nominated by Committee of Creditors of Ariisto Developers Pvt. Ltd. held that a resolution professional (RP) would not be entitled to a 'success fees' that is based upon certain contingency and is speculative in nature. The NCLAT observed that the fee charged by an RP must be reasonable and based on the services rendered in the insolvency resolution process. The NCLAT concluded that a success fee for an RP was not covered by the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) or the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016 (Regulations). In this article, we briefly navigate through the facts and findings of the case which led to the aforementioned judgment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from