Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JULY 2025

Supreme Court: Agent Status Determines Principal Employer Liability Under ESI Act - Designation Irrelevant

Argus Partners
Argus Partners
Contributor
Argus Partners

Argus Partners

Argus Partners is a leading Indian law firm with offices in Mumbai, Delhi, Bengaluru, and Kolkata....

View firm profile
Explore more from Argus Partners

On April 17, 2025, the Supreme Court of India ("Court") in Ajay Raj Shetty v. Director (Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 3743 of 2024), upheld the conviction of the general manager of Messrs.

IndiaEmployment and HR

On April 17, 2025, the Supreme Court of India ("Court") in Ajay Raj Shetty v. Director (Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 3743 of 2024), upheld the conviction of the general manager of Messrs. Electriex (India) Limited, Mr. Ajay Raj Shetty ("Appellant"), under Section 85(i)(b) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 ("ESI Act") for non-remittance of ESI contributions to the Employees State Insurance Corporation ("ESIC" or "Respondent") under the ESI Act, despite deduction of the same from the employees' wages.

Facts

On February 1, 2011, the ESIC carried out an inspection at the factory premises of M/s Electriex (India) Limited ("Company") to verify deductions towards ESI contributions for the period commencing February 1, 2010, to December 31, 2010. Pursuant to the inspection, it was revealed that while ESI contributions amounting to Rs. 8,26,696 (Rupees eight lac twenty-six thousand six hundred ninety-six) had been deducted from employees' wages, it

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from