Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2026

SEBI Amends SEBI (InvIT) Regulations, 2014

Sagus Legal
Sagus Legal
Contributor
Sagus Legal

Sagus Legal

We are a full-service law firm providing comprehensive legal advisory and advocacy to clients. Our...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sagus Legal

SEBI has introduced significant amendments to InvIT, AIF, and REIT regulations, lowering credit risk thresholds for liquid mutual funds and expanding investment flexibility.

IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
Sagus Legal LLP
Sagus Legal LLP

The Securities Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), by notification dated 16.04.20261, has notified the SEBI (Infrastructure Investment Trusts) (Amendment) Regulations, 2026 (“InvIT Amendment Regulations”) amending the SEBI (Infrastructure Investment Trusts) Regulations, 2014 (“InvIT Regulations”).

The key amendments introduced in the InvIT Amendment Regulations are:

(i) Lower credit risk value of liquid mutual funds: mutual funds which qualify as liquid assets under the InvIT regulations now include units of liquid mutual fund schemes where credit risk value is at least 10 and which falls under the Class A-I or Class B-I in the potential risk class matrix as specified by SEBI. Additionally, investment norms under regulation 18 are also updated, lowering the credit risk value for units of liquid mutual funds from 12 to 10 and which now include Class B-1 liquid mutual funds

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

CCPS In India: Why Compulsorily Convertible Preference Shares Remain Central To Venture Capital And M&A Transactions

Compulsorily Convertible Preference Shares (CCPS) remain one of the most widely used instruments for venture capital and private equity investments in Indian companies. Their appeal lies in the ability to combine equity classification with negotiated economic and governance protections. But CCPS are not governed by a single, standalone statutory framework. Their legal treatment is instead shaped by the Companies Act, FEMA and foreign investment rules, tax law, and, where applicable, SEBI regulations.
IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
King, Stubb & Kasiva
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Article

FCRA Amendment Rules, 2026: Key Changes And Practical Implications

AZB & Partners provides important disclaimers regarding the nature and purpose of their website, clarifying that no solicitation or advertising has occurred and that the information is provided solely at the user's request. The firm outlines the limitations of the website content and emphasizes that accessing it does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Users are informed about their responsibilities when using the site and the firm's intellectual property rights over the content.
IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
AZB & Partners
AZB & Partners
Article

Supreme Court Holds That Electricity Utilities Are Governed By The Rule Of Strict Liability, And Not Absolute Liability, In Claims Arising Out Of Electrocution

The Supreme Court of India, through its judgment dated 12.08.2026 in Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited v. Rekha and Others , set aside concurrent orders of the High Court of Karnataka which had fastened absolute liability upon the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (“KPTCL”) in respect of two electrocution incidents.
IndiaEnergy and Natural Resources
Sagus Legal
Sagus Legal
Article

Supreme Court Affirms That Cheque Dishonour Complaints Cannot Be Quashed At The Pre-trial Stage Once Ingredients Of Section 138 Of The NI Act Are Satisfied

The Supreme Court through its judgement dated 07.04.2026 in Renuka v. the State of Maharashtra & Anr. affirmed that where the basic ingredients of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 are satisfied, the complaint cannot be dismissed at the pre-trial stage on the ground that the cheque was not issued towards a legally enforceable debt.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sagus Legal
Sagus Legal