Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 NOVEMBER 2019

Maintainability Of Application For Compromise And Arrangement During Liquidation Proceeding

The Appellant Jindal Steel and Power Limited filed the appeal under section 421 of the Companies act...

IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law

The purpose of this article is to analyse the recent NCLAT order in the case of Jindal Steel and Power Limited v. Arun Kumar Jagatramka & Gujarat NRE Coke Limited (Company Appeal (AT) No. 221 of 2018). This article shall attempt to analyse and discuss the implication of the said order with respect to companies undergoing liquidation.

Factual Background

The Appellant Jindal Steel and Power Limited filed the appeal under section 421 of the Companies act, 2013(hereinafter referred to as Companies Act) against the order of National Company Law Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as NCLT), Kolkata Bench, whereby the tribunal allowed application of compromise and arrangement during the liquidation process as per Section 230-232 of Companies Act, filed by Promoter between himself and the corporate debtor. The Gujarat NRE coke Limited (Corporate Debtor) filed an application in NCLT for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process as per Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from