Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JULY 2016

A Common Right To Arbitrate: Anti-Suit Injunctions In New York And England

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

An important consideration when drafting an enforceable arbitration agreement is the legal "seat," or juridical location, of the arbitration

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

An important consideration when drafting an enforceable arbitration agreement is the legal "seat," or juridical location, of the arbitration. Both London and New York have established themselves as favorable arbitral seats because of their willingness to compel and safeguard the efficacy of parties' agreements to arbitrate.

In its simplest form, an arbitration agreement is a mutual promise to resolve defined disputes through an arbitral process, rather than resorting to courts. This promise includes a positive obligation to submit the dispute to an agreed arbitral forum, and a negative obligation to refrain from commencing proceedings in a forum other than that specified in the arbitration agreement.1 While the positive obligation is addressed by a court's power to compel arbitration, the negative obligation may be effected through the grant of an anti-suit injunction in support of the arbitration agreement. The duality of obligations was reflected in Pena Copper

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from