Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2025

LD The Hague, October 22, 2025, Provisional Measures, UPC_CFI_587/2025

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

In March 2025, the extent to which the claims would be upheld was decided in the oral hearing of the opposition proceedings before the EPO. The Proprietor then purchased the defendant's products for analysis in April 2025...

GermanyIntellectual Property

1 Key takeaways

The need for a certain amount of time to assess infringement does not generally constitute an unreasonable delay in seeking provisional measures (R. 211.4 RoP)

In March 2025, the extent to which the claims would be upheld was decided in the oral hearing of the opposition proceedings before the EPO. The Proprietor then purchased the defendant's products for analysis in April 2025 and filed the application for provisional measures in June 2025. The Court did not consider this to be an unreasonable delay in seeking provisional measures, but rather deemed it reasonable that the Applicant needed time to analyze the products in order to assess infringement.

2 Division

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from