Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 DECEMBER 2025

LD Paris, November 21, 2025, Order On Provisional Measures, UPC_CFI_697-2025

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

The LD Paris clarifies that the relevant moment for assessing delay is the point in time when the applicant knew or should have known about the upcoming infringing act – not when infringement has already occurred...

GermanyIntellectual Property

1 Key takeaways

Clarification of "Unreasonable Delay" under Rule 211.4 RoP

The LD Paris clarifies that the relevant moment for assessing delay is the point in time when the applicant knew or should have known about the upcoming infringing act – not when infringement has already occurred, thereby aligning with other UPC case law (cf. UPC CoA ORD_44387/2024, 25 September 2024, Mammut Sports v Ortovox, and UPC CoA, 446/2025, 13 August 2025, Boehringer v Zentiva).

Price and Reimbursement Approval as Trigger Event in Pharma Cases

In the pharmaceutical context, the LD Paris holds that price and reimbursement approval may already constitute the decisive trigger event for urgency. Once the pricing decision is issued, a market entry becomes foreseeable; applicants must act promptly or risk losing interim protection.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from