Accordion Heading
Content 1
1. Key takeaways
Release of Security for Costs Requires Independent
Financial Standing
The UPC held that R. 352.2 RoP also applies to the release of a
security for legal costs, even though this is not explicitly
mentioned in Rule 158 RoP, which governs the imposition of such
securities. The Court ultimately rejected Claimant's request to
release the security as Claimant failed to demonstrate its own,
independent financial capacity to pay potential cost awards,
despite undergoing restructuring and being acquired by a
financially sound parent company.
The Court emphasized that the financial standing of the party
itself, not its parent company or group, is the decisive factor for
assessing a request to release a security for costs.