Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 AUGUST 2014

Precedent Fails To Help Applicants

Jiancheng Jiang of Peksung Intellectual Property describes recent case law relating to second-use inventions, and asks whether the judgments will break through China's reliance on codified laws

ChinaIntellectual Property

Jiancheng Jiang of Peksung Intellectual Property describes recent case law relating to second-use inventions, and asks whether the judgments will break through China's reliance on codified laws

In China, as in other countries around the world, methods for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases may not be granted a patent right (article 25.1 of the Chinese Patent Law). Under the examination practice of the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO), it is possible to use the so-called Swiss-type claim format for seeking protection for a second medical use invention of a substance so as to avoid the application of article 25.1. SIPO's Guidelines for Examination explicitly provides that the claim of a second medical-use invention can be drafted as "use of compound X for preparing a medicament for the treatment of disease Y". Such a claim type is considered as a use claim as it is a method for preparing a medicament (part II, chapter 10, section 4.5.2 of the Guidelines

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from